Enhanced Service Capacity for Severe Mental Illness: A Comparative Analysis of Certified Community Behavioral Health Centers, Community Mental Health Centers, and Federally Qualified Health Centers
- Matthews, Elizabeth B.
- Stanhope, Victoria
Objectives
The objective of this study is to update estimates of comprehensive service availability among CCBHCs and compare them to other settings serving individuals with severe mental illness, including community mental health centers (CMHCs) and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).
Study Design and Setting
This study is a cross–sectional secondary data analysis.
Data Sources and Analytic Sample
Using 2022 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey (N–SUMHSS) data, logistic regression examined associations between service setting (CCBHC, CMHC, FQHC) and the availability of psychiatric, health management, and navigation, and social care services.
Principle Findings
Compared to CCBHCs, FQHC designation was associated with a decreased likelihood of offering psychiatric rehabilitation services, including ACT (marginal effect = -0.26, 95% CI: -0.33 to -0.19) and peer coaching (marginal effect = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.43 to -0.29), and psychiatric crisis intervention (marginal effect = -0.14, 95% CI: -0.22 to -0.07). Rates of health management services were comparable to those at CCBHCs. CMHCs were also less likely to offer health management services (marginal effect = -0.26, 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.21) and a range of psychiatric rehabilitation services relative to CCBHCs.
Conclusions
CCBHC certified clinics were more likely to offer psychiatric and social services than FQHC or CMHC clinics serving individuals with severe mental illness.