Peripheral IV Site Change When Clinically Indicated vs. Customary Practice of Every 96 Hours
- Apel, Stacey
- Brucker, Nicole
- Bond, Jennifer
- Weitzel, Tina
- Chamberlain, Jill
Routine replacement of peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters causes dissatisfaction among patients, creates poor use of nursing time, and increases cost to the organization. An evidence-based practice project initiated by a nursing shared governance council demonstrated no significant difference (p=0.318) in phlebitis rates between IVs changed every 72-96 hours and when clinically indicated.
Clinical Question
In adult, acute care patients, does leaving an intravenous (IV) line intact until removal is clinically indicated (end of therapy, redness, occlusion, or leakage) versus the customary practice of changing the IV after 96 hours of dwell time impact rates of phlebitis?
Evidence-Based Practice Model
Revised Iowa Model ()
Patient Outcomes
The primary outcome measure for this study was incidence of phlebitis (measured as percent of IV catheters that developed signs or symptoms of phlebitis). The defined phlebitis as the presence of pain, tenderness, erythema, warmth, swelling, induration, purulence, or palpable venous cord.
Search Strategy
Keywords for the literature search included peripheral venous catheters, dwell time, catheter-related infections, phlebitis, and complication for 2016-2020. Exclusion criteria included pediatric patients, midline catheters, central lines, and securement devices. After 67 articles were retrieved initially, researchers’ review for relevancy to this project led to selection of 11 articles.
Databases
CINAHL, Clinical Key in Nursing, and PubMed
Clinical Setting
Acute care patients in a 500-bed Magnet®-designated, Level 1 trauma hospital in the midwestern United States