Pulmonary-Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure

  • Khan, Mohammed N. M.D.
  • Jaïs, Pierre M.D.
  • Cummings, Jennifer M.D.
  • Di Biase, Luigi M.D.
  • Sanders, Prashanthan M.D.
  • Martin, David O. M.D.
  • Kautzner, Josef M.D.
  • Hao, Steven M.D.
  • Themistoclakis, Sakis M.D.
  • Fanelli, Raffaele M.D.
  • Potenza, Domenico M.D.
  • Massaro, Raimondo M.D.
  • Wazni, Oussama M.D.
  • Schweikert, Robert M.D.
  • Saliba, Walid M.D.
  • Wang, Paul M.D.
  • Al-Ahmad, Amin M.D.
  • Beheiry, Salwa M.D.
  • Santarelli, Pietro M.D.
  • Starling, Randall C. M.D.
  • Russo, Antonio Dello M.D.
  • Pelargonio, Gemma M.D.
  • Brachmann, Johannes M.D.
  • Schibgilla, Volker M.D.
  • Bonso, Aldo M.D.
  • Casella, Michela M.D.
  • Raviele, Antonio M.D.
  • Haïssaguerre, Michel M.D.
  • Natale, Andrea M.D.
New England Journal of Medicine 359(17):p 1778-1785, October 23, 2008. | DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708234

Background

Pulmonary-vein isolation is increasingly being used to treat atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure.

Methods

In this prospective, multicenter clinical trial, we randomly assigned patients with symptomatic, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation, an ejection fraction of 40% or less, and New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure to undergo either pulmonary-vein isolation or atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing. All patients completed the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 105, with a higher score indicating a worse quality of life) and underwent echocardiography and a 6-minute walk test (the composite primary end point). Over a 6-month period, patients were monitored for both symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation.

Results

In all, 41 patients underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, and 40 underwent atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing; none were lost to follow-up at 6 months. The composite primary end point favored the group that underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, with an improved questionnaire score at 6 months (60, vs. 82 in the group that underwent atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing; P<0.001), a longer 6-minute-walk distance (340 m vs. 297 m, P<0.001), and a higher ejection fraction (35% vs. 28%, P<0.001). In the group that underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, 88% of patients receiving antiarrhythmic drugs and 71% of those not receiving such drugs were free of atrial fibrillation at 6 months. In the group that underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, pulmonary-vein stenosis developed in two patients, pericardial effusion in one, and pulmonary edema in another; in the group that underwent atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing, lead dislodgment was found in one patient and pneumothorax in another.

Conclusions

Pulmonary-vein isolation was superior to atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure who had drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00599976.)

Copyright © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.