Pulmonary-Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure
- Khan, Mohammed N. M.D.
- Jaïs, Pierre M.D.
- Cummings, Jennifer M.D.
- Di Biase, Luigi M.D.
- Sanders, Prashanthan M.D.
- Martin, David O. M.D.
- Kautzner, Josef M.D.
- Hao, Steven M.D.
- Themistoclakis, Sakis M.D.
- Fanelli, Raffaele M.D.
- Potenza, Domenico M.D.
- Massaro, Raimondo M.D.
- Wazni, Oussama M.D.
- Schweikert, Robert M.D.
- Saliba, Walid M.D.
- Wang, Paul M.D.
- Al-Ahmad, Amin M.D.
- Beheiry, Salwa M.D.
- Santarelli, Pietro M.D.
- Starling, Randall C. M.D.
- Russo, Antonio Dello M.D.
- Pelargonio, Gemma M.D.
- Brachmann, Johannes M.D.
- Schibgilla, Volker M.D.
- Bonso, Aldo M.D.
- Casella, Michela M.D.
- Raviele, Antonio M.D.
- Haïssaguerre, Michel M.D.
- Natale, Andrea M.D.
Background
Pulmonary-vein isolation is increasingly being used to treat atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure.
Methods
In this prospective, multicenter clinical trial, we randomly assigned patients with symptomatic, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation, an ejection fraction of 40% or less, and New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure to undergo either pulmonary-vein isolation or atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing. All patients completed the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 105, with a higher score indicating a worse quality of life) and underwent echocardiography and a 6-minute walk test (the composite primary end point). Over a 6-month period, patients were monitored for both symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation.
Results
In all, 41 patients underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, and 40 underwent atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing; none were lost to follow-up at 6 months. The composite primary end point favored the group that underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, with an improved questionnaire score at 6 months (60, vs. 82 in the group that underwent atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing; P<0.001), a longer 6-minute-walk distance (340 m vs. 297 m, P<0.001), and a higher ejection fraction (35% vs. 28%, P<0.001). In the group that underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, 88% of patients receiving antiarrhythmic drugs and 71% of those not receiving such drugs were free of atrial fibrillation at 6 months. In the group that underwent pulmonary-vein isolation, pulmonary-vein stenosis developed in two patients, pericardial effusion in one, and pulmonary edema in another; in the group that underwent atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing, lead dislodgment was found in one patient and pneumothorax in another.
Conclusions
Pulmonary-vein isolation was superior to atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure who had drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00599976.)