Ovid
Statistics for Systematic Review Authors
Publication Year: 2012
Edition: 1st Ed.
Authors/Editor: Tufanaru, Catalin; Huang, William J.; Tsay, Shwu-Feng; Chou, Shin-Shang
ISBN: 978-1-46-981318-9
Description
The role of statistics in the systematic review process is extremely important. For healthcare providers and researchers completing a systematic review, this book will teach you how to use the proper statistical method to determine the odds ratio, risk differential and other crucial measurements to verify the validity and applicability of your systematic review.
Details
Platform: Ovid Product Type: BookAuthor/Editor: Tufanaru, Catalin; Huang, William J.; Tsay, Shwu-Feng; Chou, Shin-Shang
ISBN: 978-1-46-981318-9
Specialty:
Evidence-Based Medicine
Language: English
Edition: 1st Ed.
Pages: 77
Year: 2012
Collections
Statistics for Systematic Review Authors
Also Recommended
- Synthesizing Descriptive Evidence
- Critically Appraising Evidence for Healthcare
- Synthesizing Evidence of Diagnostic Accuracy
- Synthesizing Qualitative Evidence
- Knowledge Translation in Healthcare
- Synthesizing Evidence of Risk
- Synthesizing Quantitative Evidence
- Translation Science and the JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare
- Synthesizing Evidence from Narrative, Text and Opinion
- Synthesizing Evidence of Harm
- Synthesizing Economic Evidence
- Clinical Wisdom and Evidence-Based Healthcare
- CAN-Implement©: Planning for Best-Practice Implementation
- Synthesis of Prevalence and Incidence Data, The
- International Collaboration in Translational Health Science
- Guideline Adaptation: Conducting Systematic, Exhaustive, and Reproducible Searches
- Turning Knowledge into Action: Practical Guidance on How to Do Integrated Knowledge Translation Research
- Public Engagement in Translating Knowledge to Action
- Mixed Methods Approach to Evidence Synthesis, A
- Stakeholder Engagement: The Role of Tacit Knowledge and Value Statements in Translation Science
- Historical Emergence of Qualitative Synthesis, The
- Implementing Evidence Using an Action Research Framework
- Comparison of Meta-Aggregation and Meta-Ethnography as Qualitative Review Methods, A
- Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (EBMR)
- Ovid MEDLINE®
- Neurology Clinical Practice
- Neurology
- JBI PACES
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- JAMA Psychiatry
Loading