LipiDisease

associate lipids to diseases using literature mining

  • More, Piyush
  • Bindila, Laura
  • Wild, Philipp
  • Andrade-Navarro, Miguel
  • Fontaine, Jean-Fred
Bioinformatics 37(21):p 3981-3982, November 01, 2021. | DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab559

1 Introduction

Lipids are a diverse group of organic compounds having characteristic solubilities in nonpolar solvents. They exhibit essential roles in cellular assembly, signaling and energy storage. Over the past few years, there has been an increasing interest in untargeted lipidomics, largely driven by the technological advancements in lipid profiling and functional analysis improving, thus, our understanding of lipid biology. The lipidomic analysis encompasses lipid quantification and identification, allowing both insights into changes into the structural heterogeneity and into individual lipid levels in a biospecimen. It is evident that the lipidome is altered during disease development and comparative lipidomics could identify lipid biomarkers for disease prognosis or even intervention (; ). For this reason, it is important to develop methods to identify lipids that could be predictive of disease type, progression and risk using the study of lipidomics data.

One of the ways to identify disease-relevant biomarkers is to associate them with diseases using pre-existing literature data. Enrichment analysis is a computational procedure to assist this task in an automated and exhaustive manner. Enrichment analysis is performed to associate a set of biomolecules, for example, derived from a high-throughput experiment, with a biological trait. The analysis compares the association of biomolecules with a background set to identify significantly associated candidates with biological traits. The background association is derived from biological information and is typically obtained from experimental datasets and information databases. There is a plethora of such resources available for genomics and proteomics data that perform pathway enrichment, disease association and more (; ; ; ). Such databases and tools are severely lacking in the case of lipids because of the stronger focus of the omics field on DNA, RNA and protein biology (), and consequently, the enrichment analysis of lipids is limited to their categorization and pathway identification (; ; ; ), while their functional enrichment is lacking. While much information on metabolite association with diseases can be accessed and retrieved from databases such as MarkerDB () and Human Metabolome Database (), a dedicated database for lipids is missing. LipidPedia is a resource specialized in associating lipids with biomedical information (). It utilizes full-text mining focused on individual lipids, but lacks statistical filtering and does not allow manual inspection of the underlying basis for disease associations. Furthermore, currently, there is no way to analyze a set of lipids and consider their cumulative association, which is more relevant in human diseases.

The LipiDisease web server aims to address this by providing a web app performing disease enrichment analysis using a set of lipids and ranking them for prioritizing the diseases. It utilizes the PubMed database listing more than 26 million biomedical records with their manual associations with chemicals and diseases. We expect that the web server will contribute to a better understanding of lipid-disease associations and will inspire the development of many such tools expanding our knowledge about lipids beyond membranes and signaling.

2 Implementation

LipiDisease is built around the biomedical literature from the PubMed database. With a focus on avoiding false positive, instead of full-text mining, it utilizes the manual annotations of the PubMed records using the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus MeSH. Disease terms were extracted from the branch ‘C’ of the MeSH. The list of lipids and corresponding PubChem Compound ID numbers (CIDs) were obtained from Lipid Maps (). Articles corresponding to the lipid PubChem CIDs were obtained from PubMed using NCBI’s Entrez Programming Utilities. The entire data was locally stored in a MySQL database (details in Supplementary Information).

The interactive web app was built using the Shiny package in R (). JavaScript functionalities were implemented using the shinyjs package. The required input for the web server is either a set of PubChem CIDs for lipids or MeSH Unique IDs for diseases depending on the analysis. There are the following four types of analysis:

  • Lipid-set enrichment;

  • Lipids to Diseases;

  • Diseases to Lipids;

  • Lipid-set enrichment (with fold changes).

The Lipid-set enrichment option considers a list of lipids. These lipids are considered collectively for disease enrichment analysis. Lipids to Diseases and Diseases to Lipids consider individual lipids and diseases, respectively, and identify associations using individual entries; using either of these two analyses is close to browsing our underlying database of associations. Lipid-set enrichment (with fold changes) is similar to Lipid-set enrichment with the additional consideration of lipid-level statistics (e.g. fold changes for the lipid expression between two biological conditions). To understand the functionality of the web server, users can use the test cases by clicking on the ‘example’ link next to every analysis type.

An analysis is done in seconds using the pre-indexed data. The output is represented in table and plot form, which can be downloaded locally for further exploration. The output table can be downloaded in TSV format (entries separated by TAB) and can be accessed using text or spreadsheet programs. The table provides hyperlinks to corresponding lipid PubChem CIDs, disease MeSH terms and PubMed records.

The predicted enrichment is derived from the manual annotations of the PubMed records with the lipid PubChem CIDs using a computational procedure employed before for literature mining of gene to disease associations (see Supplementary Information for details; ). In short, lipid enrichment is performed by identifying the over-representation of PubMed articles using one-tailed Fisher’s exact test. The results are then ranked according to false discovery rate calculated by Benjamini and Hochberg method (). The type of association (for example, positive or negative) cannot be derived from this. However, the links from the results to the underlying data that was used to derive the associations, particularly the connections to the relevant literature through PubMed records, facilitate post-analysis of the results.

3 Conclusion

An online web server, LipiDisease, was constructed to predict significant associations between lipids and diseases using literature mining. LipiDisease is the first tool performing disease enrichment using a set of lipids and providing a ranked list of statistically significant associations. The tool provides a user-friendly web interface and outputs results in tabular as well as graphical form, with links to the underlying data used in the literature mining procedure, making it easier to generate hypotheses about the involvement of lipids in disease.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the help from the IT group at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. They thank Prof. Leszek Wojnowski from the Department of Pharmacology, University Medical Center Mainz for his insightful comments.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany, grant program Forschungskernen für Massenspektrometrie in der Systemmedizin (MSCoreSys) to project Data-Independent Acquisition-based Systems Medicine: Mass spectrometry for high-throughput deep phenotyping of the heart failure syndrome (DIASyM) to M.A. (funding number: 031L0217B).

Conflict of Interest: none declared.

References

  • Acevedo A. et al (2018) LIPEA: lipid pathway enrichment analysis bioinformatics. bioRxiv, 274969.
    Cited Here
  • Alfoldi J., Lindblad-Toh K. (2013) Comparative genomics as a tool to understand evolution and disease. Genome Res., 23, 1063–1068.
    Cited Here
  • Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol., 57, 289–300.
    Cited Here
  • Clair G. et al (2019) Lipid Mini-On: mining and ontology tool for enrichment analysis of lipidomic data. Bioinformatics, 35, 4507–4508.
    Cited Here
  • Conesa A. et al (2016) A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis. Genome Biol., 17, 13.
    Cited Here
  • Fahy E. et al (2009) Update of the LIPID MAPS comprehensive classification system for lipids. J. Lipid Res., 50, S9–14.
    Cited Here
  • Fontaine J., Andrade-Navarro M. (2016) Gene Set to Diseases (GS2D): disease enrichment analysis on human gene sets with literature data. Genomics Comput. Biol., 2, e33.
    Cited Here
  • Ghosh A., Nishtala K. (2017) Biofluid lipidome: a source for potential diagnostic biomarkers. Clin. Transl. Med., 6, 22.
    Cited Here
  • Kuo T.-C., Tseng Y.J. (2018) LipidPedia: a comprehensive lipid knowledgebase. Bioinformatics, 34, 2982–2987.
    Cited Here
  • Lydic T.A., Goo Y. (2018) Lipidomics unveils the complexity of the lipidome in metabolic diseases. Clin. Transl. Med, 7, 4.
    Cited Here
  • Martin S.S. et al (2013) Very large database of lipids: rationale and design. Clin. Cardiol., 36, 641–648.
    Cited Here
  • Molenaar M.R. et al (2019) LION/web: a web-based ontology enrichment tool for lipidomic data analysis. GigaScience, 8, giz061.
    Cited Here
  • R Core Team. (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
    Cited Here
  • Schmidt A. et al (2014) Bioinformatic analysis of proteomics data. BMC Syst. Biol., 8, S3.
    Cited Here
  • Stephenson D.J. et al (2017) Lipidomics in translational research and the clinical significance of lipid-based biomarkers. Transl. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med., 189, 13–29.
    Cited Here
  • Wishart D.S. et al (2007) HMDB: the human metabolome database. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D521–D526.
    Cited Here
  • Wishart D.S. et al (2021) MarkerDB: an online database of molecular biomarkers. Nucleic Acids Res., 49, D1259–D1267.
    Cited Here
Copyright © Copyright Oxford University Press 2021.
View full text|Download PDF