The case against 'the evidence': a different perspective on evidence-based medicine

  • WILLIAMS, D. D. R.
  • GARNER, JANE
British Journal of Psychiatry 180:p 8-12, January 2002.

Background

An evidenced-based approach to psychiatry is playing an increasingly prominent role in treatment decision-making for individual patients and for populations. Many doctors are now critical of the emphasis being placed on 'the evidence' and concerned that clinical practice will become more constrained.

Aims

To demonstrate that evidence-based medicine is not new, sources of evidence are limited and psychosocial aspects of medicine are neglected in this process.

Method

Some of the literature is reviewed. Ideas and arguments are synthesised into a critical commentary.

Results

These are considered under four headings: evidence-based medicine is not new; what evidence is acceptable; the doctor as therapist; and the emergence of a new utilitarian orthodoxy.

Conclusions

It is agreed that a degree of professional consensus is necessary. However, too great an emphasis on evidence-based medicine oversimplifies the complex and interpersonal nature of clinical care.

Declaration of interest

None.

Copyright © 2002 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
View full text