Efficacy of atypical v. typical antipsychotics in the treatment of early psychosis

meta-analysis

  • Crossley, Nicolas A. MRCPsych, MSc
  • Constante, Miguel MRCPsych
  • McGuire, Philip FRCPsych, PhD
  • Power, Paddy MRCPsych, FRANZCP, MD
British Journal of Psychiatry 196(6):p 434-439, June 2010.

Background

There is an ongoing debate about the use of atypical antipsychotics as a first-line treatment for first-episode psychosis.

Aims

To examine the evidence base for this recommendation.

Method

Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials in the early phase of psychosis, looking at long-term discontinuation rates, short-term symptom changes, weight gain and extrapyramidal side-effects. Trials were identified using a combination of electronic (Cochrane Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) and manual searches.

Results

Fifteen randomised controlled trials with a total of 2522 participants were included. No significant differences between atypical and typical drugs were found for discontinuation rates (odds ratio (OR) = 0.7, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2) or effect on symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) = −0.1, 95% CI −0.2 to 0.02). Participants on atypical antipsychotics gained 2.1 kg (95% CI 0.1 to 4.1) more weight than those on typicals, whereas those on typicals experienced more extrapyramidal side-effects (SMD = −0.4, 95% CI −0.5 to −0.2).

Conclusions

There was no evidence for differences in efficacy between atypical and typical antipsychotics, but there was a clear difference in the side-effect profile.

Copyright © 2010 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
View full text|Download PDF