Reliability and validity of the Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS) Swedish version 6.0

Svensson, Siv
Sonn, Ulla
Sunnerhagen, Katharina Stibrant

Siv Svensson Institute for Clinical Neuroscience — Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulla Sonn Institute of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg University and Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen Institute for Clinical Neuroscience — Rehabilitation Medicine, Goteborg, Sweden

Address for correspondence: Siv Svensson, Occupational Therapist, Rehabilitation Medicin SU/Högsbo, Box 301 10, SE-400 43 Göteborg, Sweden. e-mail: [email protected]

Received 8th November 2003; returned for revisions 12th January 2004; revised manuscript accepted 3rd April 2004.

Clinical Rehabilitation 19(4):p 419-425, April 2005.

Objective

To translate, to test inter-rater and intra-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Basic Care Needs (BCN) section of the Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS).

Design

Test-retest reliability and validity testing. Observed data were collected by the staff (nursing staff, occupational therapists).

Setting

Three rehabilitation units.

Subjects

Forty inpatients between 16 and 65 years of age with brain injury were included.

Main measures

Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability was calculated by percentage agreement (PA) and unweighted kappa measure. Concurrent validity was examined by computing Goodman-Kruskal's gamma, a nonparametric statistic for degree of association between the BCN score and the total score of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

Results

Inter-rater reliability showed a good percentage agreement between nursing staff. Between nursing staff and occupational therapists the percentage agreement was lower especially in one item. Intra-rater reliability showed a good percentage agreement for all assessors. Concordance was good with a gamma −0.83 and an asymptotic error (ase) of 0.04, for nursing staff and for occupational therapists −0.87, ase 0.04.

Conclusion

The BCN section of NPDS was found to be inter-rater and intra-rater reliable, to have concurrent validity. Further studies are needed on clinical utility. The instrument can be used for assessment of dependency for individual patients with brain injury, and information when transferring between different caregivers. Further studies need to investigate the sensitivity of the instrument.