Comparing five-year and ten-year predicted cardiovascular disease risk in Aotearoa New Zealand

national data linkage study of 1.7 million adults

  • Liang, Jingyuan
  • Wells, Susan
  • Jackson, Rod
  • Choi, Yeunhyang
  • Mehta, Suneela
  • Chung, Claris
  • Gao, Pei
  • Poppe, Katrina K
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology Publish Ahead of Print, November 07, 2024. | DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae361

Lay Summary

Given the lack of consensus on the optimal time horizon for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk to inform preventive treatment decisions, our study compared predicted 5-year and 10-year CVD risk in a national cohort of people without prior CVD.

  • 5-year and 10-year CVD risk prediction equations selected largely the same people in the top risk quintile (rank-based comparison), however the overall median 10-year CVD risk was approximately 2.5 times the median 5-year risk. Consequently, common 5-year and 10-year guideline-recommended treatment thresholds (5% 5-year and 10% 10-year risk) identified different proportions of treatment-eligible individuals. Approximately twice as many men as women were identified as treatment-eligible regardless of the risk prediction horizon.

  • These findings indicate that recommended treatment thresholds, not how 5-year and 10-year equations rank individuals by risk, are the main determinant of treatment eligibility.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].

Copyright © 2025 SAGE Publications
View full text|Download PDF