Watchful Waiting vs Repair of Inguinal Hernia in Minimally Symptomatic Men

A Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Fitzgibbons, Robert J. Jr MD
  • Giobbie-Hurder, Anita MS
  • Gibbs, James O. PhD
  • Dunlop, Dorothy D. PhD
  • Reda, Domenic J. PhD
  • McCarthy, Martin Jr PhD
  • Neumayer, Leigh A. MD
  • Barkun, Jeffrey S. T. MD
  • Hoehn, James L. MD
  • Murphy, Joseph T. MD
  • Sarosi, George A. Jr MD
  • Syme, William C. MD
  • Thompson, Jon S. MD
  • Wang, Jia MS
  • Jonasson, Olga MD
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 295(3):p 285-292, January 18, 2006.

Context

Many men with inguinal hernia have minimal symptoms. Whether deferring surgical repair is a safe and acceptable option has not been assessed.

Objective

To compare pain and the physical component score (PCS) of the Short Form-36 Version 2 survey at 2 years in men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias treated with watchful waiting or surgical repair.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Randomized trial conducted January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2004, at 5 North American centers and enrolling 720 men (364 watchful waiting, 356 surgical repair) followed up for 2 to 4.5 years.

Interventions

Watchful-waiting patients were followed up at 6 months and annually and watched for hernia symptoms; repair patients received standard open tension-free repair and were followed up at 3 and 6 months and annually.

Main Outcome Measures

Pain and discomfort interfering with usual activities at 2 years and change in PCS from baseline to 2 years. Secondary outcomes were complications, patient-reported pain, functional status, activity levels, and satisfaction with care.

Results

Primary intention-to-treat outcomes were similar at 2 years for watchful waiting vs surgical repair: pain limiting activities (5.1% vs 2.2%, respectively; P = .52); PCS (improvement over baseline, 0.29 points vs 0.13 points; P = .79). Twenty-three percent of patients assigned to watchful waiting crossed over to receive surgical repair (increase in hernia-related pain was the most common reason offered); 17% assigned to receive repair crossed over to watchful waiting. Self-reported pain in watchful-waiting patients crossing over improved after repair. Occurrence of postoperative hernia-related complications was similar in patients who received repair as assigned and in watchful-waiting patients who crossed over. One watchful-waiting patient (0.3%) experienced acute hernia incarceration without strangulation within 2 years; a second had acute incarceration with bowel obstruction at 4 years, with a frequency of 1.8/1000 patient-years inclusive of patients followed up for as long as 4.5 years.

Conclusions

Watchful waiting is an acceptable option for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Delaying surgical repair until symptoms increase is safe because acute hernia incarcerations occur rarely.

Clinical Trials Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00263250

Copyright © 2006 by the American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use. American Medical Association, 515 N. State St, Chicago, IL 60610.
View full text|Download PDF