Cross-lingual Natural Language Processing on Limited Annotated Case/Radiology Reports in English and Japanese: Insights from the Real-MedNLP Workshop

  • Yada, Shuntaro
  • Nakamura, Yuta
  • Wakamiya, Shoko
  • Aramaki, Eiji
Methods of Information in Medicine 63(5/6):p 145-163, December 2024. | DOI: 10.1055/a-2405-2489

Abstract

Background

Textual datasets (corpora) are crucial for the application of natural language processing (NLP) models. However, corpus creation in the medical field is challenging, primarily because of privacy issues with raw clinical data such as health records. Thus, the existing clinical corpora are generally small and scarce. Medical NLP (MedNLP) methodologies perform well with limited data availability.

Objectives

We present the outcomes of the Real-MedNLP workshop, which was conducted using limited and parallel medical corpora. Real-MedNLP exhibits three distinct characteristics: (1) limited annotated documents: the training data comprise only a small set (˜100) of case reports (CRs) and radiology reports (RRs) that have been annotated. (2) Bilingually parallel: the constructed corpora are parallel in Japanese and English. (3) Practical tasks: the workshop addresses fundamental tasks, such as named entity recognition (NER) and applied practical tasks.

Methods

We propose three tasks: NER of ˜100 available documents (Task 1), NER based only on annotation guidelines for humans (Task 2), and clinical applications (Task 3) consisting of adverse drug effect (ADE) detection for CRs and identical case identification (CI) for RRs.

Results

Nine teams participated in this study. The best systems achieved 0.65 and 0.89 F1-scores for CRs and RRs in Task 1, whereas the top scores in Task 2 decreased by 50 to 70%. In Task 3, ADE reports were detected by up to 0.64 F1-score, and CI scored up to 0.96 binary accuracy.

Conclusion

Most systems adopt medical-domain-specific pretrained language models using data augmentation methods. Despite the challenge of limited corpus size in Tasks 1 and 2, recent approaches are promising because the partial match scores reached ˜0.8-0.9 F1-scores. Task 3 applications revealed that the different availabilities of external language resources affected the performance per language.

Copyright © 2024, Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
View full text|Download PDF